A new American-Iranian alliance is better than an American-Iranian war.
"A nuclear Iran would be destabilizing," declare "serious" Middle East analysts and Western policy makers. This assertion is fundamentally wrong and anti-historical.
Are they living in the world I'm living in? The biggest destabilizing countries in the Middle East are Israel, the United States, England, and Saudi Arabia.
The shadow governments in Tel Aviv and Washington cooperated together to murder 3,000 American citizens on September 11, 2001 to serve as a propaganda excuse to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people throughout the region in the name of freedom, democracy, and Western values.
Right now, U.S.-Iranian relations are upside down. America and Iran are staring each other down from two different ends of the world. And their dysfunctional relationship is causing problems for the whole world. The rational course of action in this crisis is coming together around common objectives and interests to talk and settle differences.
A new American-Iranian alliance would transform the region for the better, and make the world less crazy. Neil Padukone, author of 'Security in a Complex Era,' asks the question: "Would It Be So Bad If Iran Got Nuclear Weapons?" He writes:
"An Iranian bomb certainly would, however, reinforce the country’s regional supremacy. But this dominance is inevitable anyway. As Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, told me, “From 1953 to 1979, the U.S. recognized Iran as the hegemon in the region. We recognized that, considering all the factors of power, from demography to military, from geography to national cohesiveness, Iran was the leader in the Gulf. Now, today, we seek to deny that reality—largely because our tyrant no longer rules. This is utterly preposterous.”An American-Iranian alliance can stabilize the Middle East, dramatically improve America's image in the Islamic world, and enable America to remain the dominant outside power in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia.
What’s more, the strategic aims of this regional power align with America’s 21st-century goals: reducing dependence on Pakistan in order to stabilize Afghanistan, countering Sunni militants like the Taliban, enabling energy and commodities trade throughout the region, working toward a stable Gulf and an unthreatening Iraq, and limiting Russian and, to a degree, Chinese influence in the region.
In his iconoclastic book, Reset, Stephen Kinzer argues that, to contend with the emerging global order, America ought to step back from its close relationships with Saudi Arabia and Israel (and, I would add, Pakistan) and embrace Iran and Turkey instead. America’s alliances with Riyadh, Tel Aviv, and Islamabad were useful in the Cold War: they could gather intelligence, aid militants, and counter the Soviets where Washington couldn’t. But today, America benefits little from its unconditional support for the status quo regimes in these countries. In fact, Washington’s closeness is harmful to all involved, enabling militarism and extremism across the Middle East and South Asia. Given the inertia in U.S.-Iranian relations, it would take a great deal of political skill to overcome the trust deficit and move forward on such an ambitious realignment.
Of course, the other “doomsday” scenario of a nuclear Iran is that the West would not be able to invade a nuclear Iran and would have to deal with Tehran on different terms. That might even be a good thing. Let’s hope it doesn’t take the nuclear option to get us there."
Below are five specific reasons why an American-Iranian alliance will be good for the Middle East and the world, and why an American-Iranian war will be bad for the Middle East and the world. The reasons are divided into five categories: strategic, cultural, political, economic, and moral.
1. The Strategic Reason.
Iran can help America stabilize Afghanistan, secure Iraq and transition it into a vibrant nation, and check Sino-Russian ambitions in Central Asia. So an American-Iranian alliance is a natural fit for both countries.
2. The Cultural Reason.
Most Iranians are pro-American, and want America and Iran to have stronger ties. An attack on Iran by the United States would turn the young people of Iran against America for the considerable future.
A war will benefit neither America nor Iran.
A war will benefit neither America nor Iran.
By forming a new relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran, America will improve its image in the Muslim world and be able to take advantage of a growing Muslim market in the world economy.
And over time, the young people of Iran will reform their country and make it more tolerant and democratic.
3. The Political Reason.
A new American-Iranian alliance will be politically good and logical for both sides.
Iran enjoys political leverage in the Middle East which America can benefit from. America and Iran can work together to help reach a just and fair peace settlement between Israel and Palestine, and make the entire region more tolerant and peaceful.
Iran enjoys political leverage in the Middle East which America can benefit from. America and Iran can work together to help reach a just and fair peace settlement between Israel and Palestine, and make the entire region more tolerant and peaceful.
America will further destroy its political credibility and legitimacy by attacking another non-aggressive Muslim country which poses no existential threat to America or her allies. So it would be politically stupid and irrational for America to go to war with Iran.
4. The Economic Reason.
A war with Iran will bankrupt America, and trigger a global economic collapse.
A new American-Iranian alliance will open a new market for American goods, and boost the world economy because global fears of an uncertain future will reduce dramatically.
5. The Moral Reason.
It is immoral to attack a peaceful, non-aggressive, and non-threatening country, let alone do it again and again in a short span of time.
Ask yourself: What has Iran done to America to warrant a full-scale military attack against Iran? It is not a crime for a country to defend its national interests and national security against hostile powers and regional bullies.
America would be in the wrong if it started a war with Iran for no legitimate reasons. America would rightly be vilified by the whole world if it decided to unlawfully murder Iranians by the thousands from the air, abolish the Iranian government, and destroyed its national infrastructure.
Conclusion.
What will America get out of attacking Iran? Nothing.
So why is America looking to initiate a crazy and illegitimate war against Iran?
Is it for Israeli hegemony?
Is it for American hegemony?
Is it to create a one world order?
Whatever and whoever an American-Iranian war is for, it cannot be morally, economically, politically, culturally, strategically, and legally defended.
World War III is not a necessary evil. It is just evil.
ONE WORD as a cause of an Iran War, Isreal!
ReplyDeleteNo one else wants it!
WHY does this puny country rule US?
Because of the power of the "supra-national" financial plutocracy, i.e., Rothschild family dynasty and others who manipulate the economies of nations thereby subjugating them; competing among themselves on a global scale for control of resources using corporate structures. Ask yourself: Who benefits from a war between Iran and US if it is neither Iran nor the US? Israel is only a proxy, and the US a "straw man."
DeleteIsylvan - A+
Delete"The biggest destabilizing countries in the Middle East are Israel, the United States, England, and Saudi Arabia."
ReplyDeleteNot England. BRITAIN. Wales and Scotland are involved as well.
Just follow the money. Iran does not have a central bank.
ReplyDeletebtw ur an idiot. iran is one of only three (3) countries on the planet WITH a CENTRAL BANK that the Rothchild's DON'T control. follow the money you ingrate.
ReplyDeleteDo you really need to insult to make your point?
DeleteI see no evidence of him being an "ingrate."
DeleteLearn to speak and write good english, or don't comment.
Richard bombed out on this one---France is another overlooked MAJOR terror player. France has the 3 rd largest Ju-wish world's poopulation.
ReplyDelete#6 Iran will keep the Israelies in check :^/
Unless the news has been squelched, France has forsaken the waters of Champagne in favor of using nuclear power to provide energy to build second rate automobiles and little plastic toys. Radioactive contamination is leaching into the region. It CAN be cured. Mumm's must be maintained.
DeleteIsrael is still the Rothschild's cat toy. With wounds and spit all over themselves. See who really built the WWII concentration camps and the details as to why. The truth will set you free. Think Jonestown times 5000. Behaviour mod, baby.
Nothing at all wrong with the reasons the writer proposes for going the way of peace rather than war. To be applauded, and all countries on the planet, with the exception of Israel, would agree with him profusely.
ReplyDeleteAmerica, Britain and France would too, but for these countries being Israel's appendages, necessary to being enlisted for shock troop duty, against not just the Islamic world, but later also the non Islamic world too.
Does that mean that Israel's three stooges, America, Britain and France, are destined to lose their sense of identity ? Yes, to be disarmed and denationed in the course of time, as otherwise revolt would emerge from there sooner than elsewhere.
This leaves, if Israel's diabolical plan works out, Israel as the only conventionally armed state - and nuclear armed state, in the world; which latter has real meaning when enforcing their New World Order, as any restive state anywhere on the planet may have its major city instantly incinerated, to bring the regional populace to heel, so to also serve as a warning to the others.
Once total control is achieved, Plan B will be put into effect; culling the disarmed and apparently helpless human population from 7,000,000,000 to - a more manageable number, which number will be decided later, being a work in progress.
Israelis, plus their diaspora, number about 15,000,000 , which is too small a number to control such a large mass indefinitely, for there will inevitably be successful revolts, for which nukes would be disproportionate to the task, and conventional riot suppression techniques might be repelled by sheer numbers.
To prevent these inevitable revolts becoming successful, it will be necessary for Israel to embark on a program of democide ahead of time, in selected locations, where communications with the rest of the world are poor, or better still, non existent.
Otherwise, as it is, Israel and the diaspora, being only 0.21% of the world's population will have a constant fear in the NWO of, at some point of her planned for permanent imperium, simply being overwhelmed by a very very angry world.
This will all be solved if we just round up all the jews and exterminate them. Distribute their wealth back to the US to the people who need it. Then the Palestinians can have their stolen land back. Everyone's happy.
ReplyDeleteplease-come down to where i live and try-if you have the giblets
DeleteI second. Exterminate AshkaNAZIS
DeleteWestern bankers want war. Doesn't matter what country they live in anymore.
ReplyDeleteThis is a funny article. But, the reality is the opposite.
ReplyDeleteisraelis are no angels, in a world without angels, but it is the religious dictatorship in Iran threatening to destroy Israel and Jews in general. Iran blew up an Israeli embassy; not vice versa. Iran blew up a Jewish community center inArgentina-killing a bunch of kids 10,000 miles away from themselves. Ran opposed the peacetalks with the Palestiians. Get your facts straight
ReplyDeleteCan't we all just get along? The Iranian president is just a big-talking sissy but he is not stupid. He would never preemptively attack Israel w/o just cause. Iran knows for a fact Israel will nuke their ass & probably take out Damascus on they way. We have much larger problems in the U.S. than Iran!
ReplyDelete