Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:56 CST

© Case Western Reserve University
Erik D. Andrulis, Assistant Professor of molecular biology and microbiology at Case Western Reserve University.
Erik D. Andrulis, Assistant Professor of molecular biology and microbiology at Case Western Reserve University.
The Earth is alive, asserts a new scientific theory of life emerging from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. The trans-disciplinary theory demonstrates that purportedly inanimate, non-living objects - for example, planets, water, proteins, and DNA - are animate, that is, alive.
Erik Andrulis, PhD, assistant professor of molecular biology and microbiology, advanced his controversial framework in his manuscript "Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life," published in the peer-reviewed journal, Life. His theory explains not only the evolutionary emergence of life on Earth and in the Universe but also the structure and function of existing cells and biospheres.
In addition to resolving long-standing paradoxes and puzzles in chemistry and biology, Andrulis' theory unifies quantum and celestial mechanics. His unorthodox solution to this quintessential problem in physics differs from mainstream approaches, like string theory, as it is simple, non-mathematical, and experimentally and experientially verifiable.
The basic idea of Andrulis' framework is that all physical reality can be modeled by a single geometric entity with life-like characteristics: the gyre. The so-called "gyromodel" depicts objects - particles, atoms, chemicals, molecules, and cells - as quantized packets of energy and matter that cycle between excited and ground states around a singularity, the gyromodel's center. A singularity is itself modeled as a gyre, wholly compatible with the thermodynamic and fractal nature of life. An example of this nested, self-similar organization is the Russian Matryoshka doll.
By fitting the gyromodel to facts accumulated over scientific history, Andrulis confirms the proposed existence of eight laws of nature. One of these, the natural law of unity, decrees that the living cell and any part of the visible universe are irreducible. This law formally establishes that there is one physical reality.
Another natural law dictates that the atomic and cosmic realms abide by identical organizational constraints. Simply put, atoms in the human body and solar systems in the universe move and behave in the exact same manner.

© Comby Institute
James Lovelock proposed the Gaia hypothesis, in which Earth is a self-regulating organism.
James Lovelock proposed the Gaia hypothesis, in which Earth is a self-regulating organism.
One debate swirls around the scientific merit of James Lovelock's popular Gaia hypothesis. By showing that the Earth is theoretically synonymous with life, Andrulis' paradigm substantiates the Gaian premise that all organisms and their surroundings on Earth are closely integrated to form a single self-regulating complex system.
Another legendary quarrel is that between biblical creationists and neo-Darwinian evolutionists. In demonstrating that the origin and evolution of life is a consequence of natural laws and physical forces, this theory synthesizes arguments and dispels assumptions from both sides of the creation-evolution debate.
To test his paradigm, Andrulis designed bidirectional flow diagrams that both depict and predict the dynamics of energy and matter. While such diagrams may be foreign to some scientists, they are standard reaction notation to chemists, biochemists, and biologists.
Andrulis has used his theory to successfully predict and identify a hidden signature of RNA biogenesis in his laboratory at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. He is now applying the gyromodel to unify and explain the evolution and development of human beings.
Reference:
Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, Life, Vol. 2:1-105 (2012).

Oh wow, they FINALLY came to the concept of Gaya. Congrads!
ReplyDeleteHow ridiculous! What a mess of meaningless propaganda using foolish rhetoric, without any real substance or explanation at all!
ReplyDeleteWhat you have here is a brief synopsis of a new theory, which is probably impossible to explain in detail in one short article.
DeleteThe problem is that you have a short attention span because you're accustomed to having all information delivered to you in thirty-second sound bites. There's a foot note provided where you can learn all about this theory instead of crying like a baby about not having everything explained to you in a few short paragraphs.
What's ridiculous is your expectation of having complex scientific theories explained to you a 25 words or less, and this same reply applies to about 6 other idiots who commented here.
Please lose your TV mentality and stop expecting everything you see to be custom-tailored entertainment designed to satisfy your childish demands.
You, sir, are my hero. :)
Deleteas above so below is nothing new
ReplyDeleteIs that Nazi physics or jewish physics??
ReplyDeleteI am familiar with the definitions of every single word used in this article, am fluent in English, have studied the sciences at the university level, and yet could not understand or see what evidence is being presented for the claim. I say this 'wanting' to believe the claim, no less.
ReplyDeleteI'm no great mind, but I don't understand how quantum and celestial physics can be unified without mathematical proofs. But then again, I don't understand a lot of things - and sometimes, though rare, I like it better that way. For example, according to these theories; is a dead cat alive? Is a naked singularity selfish or generous? How did the universe not collapse on itself at infancy? See, I don't want to know! But bravo, interesting reading, thank you.
ReplyDelete~Rampaging Manatee
"Andrulis has used his theory to successfully predict and identify a hidden signature of RNA biogenesis in his laboratory at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. He is now applying the gyromodel to unify and explain the evolution and development of human beings."..........he knows that life is designed but since he cannot postulate "God did it" he try's to rationalize some form of the Gya "hypothesis". God is the creator of the Universe and all life. Get over it.
ReplyDeleteIf you're referring to the Xstian, Jewish, or Arab god, LMAO. If you're referring to mathematics and physics as "god", then you're quite correct.
DeleteI agree with Annie L. this was strange and lacks the fundamental issue, what is it that is creating Life or organsisms.
ReplyDeleteIs it a even deeper background, when he postulates that there is Only One reality, a notion that is not the case, even to day. How is we able to comunicate with sub-atomic particles,because even that is prowed, a form of what, geniuses, work on that.
Are we a combined organism of bothe a physical entety and a energetic entety.
We are in many aspects a long way ahead, but when its regarding Human physce we are still crawling and rely on old dogmas and belifs.
Are we a function of both Wave and/or Particles.
Our realvorld and the other side.
In the shamanic tradition, its the essence of a life as a Worrier to merge those to opostitt notions.
A lifelong task, because of the sheer size of our reality, witch is wipped on place by noinsens and religion.
Read the gospel of Judas, from the Nag hammadi library.
Jhosua ben Joseph talks about that, and to the only disiple that knew What he was talking about.
There are no Gods, we are Gods.
Our biggest obstacle is our self.
Yehaa.
I dont even bother to read any more of this issue, its already irrelevant.
Sorry.
PS: Free your mind and our ass will follow(literaly).
Didn't Obi-Wan Kenobe already write a paper on this for his Jedi Thesis? Ripping off other people's work without citation is just poor science.
ReplyDeleteHehehhe. Where have you been? That's NOT new, it's called "The Unified Field Theory."
ReplyDeleteAnd btw, scientists may claim they've something new, but Indigenous Peoples and Gnostics have KNOWN this all along!
This has nothing to do with Einstein's Unified Field Theory, so what exactly is it that you're talking about? Have you ever read Einstein's Unified Field Theory, or do you just specialize in making foolish statements?
ReplyDeletei think we need to read his publication, then comment.
ReplyDeleteIt has nothing to do with any "god" or "spiritual" tender. It's all about everything being made of the exact same things (fundamental particles all produced by the same action) all intertwined since their inception, running on a program where anything concerning space, matter, and time can, and will, happen.
ReplyDeleteOnce you say "god did it," you don't have to look anymore, and you can tell people there is no need to look further, even thought here are so many more questions to be answered, and simply wanting to know is the closest thing to a gift from "god."
Erik D. Andrulis do not hear about ROMANIAN unified theory, is published and copyrighted from 3 years!
ReplyDeleteHis theory is included ...there!?...and experienced from ...2009....?!
See download menu of this FREE project!
http://www.thefundamentaluniverse.ro/
You guys seem pretty reasonable, so let me add my two cents.
Delete"i think we need to read his publication, then comment."
Well said!
It is one VERY tough slog, though. Be forewarned.
This is a version of what I have uploaded elsewhere, so if it looks familiar that's because you have visited other sites discussion this paper.
Don't be put off by the new words; words such as mirtazapine and purine did not exist until recently. Those words are neologisms -- as are most for pharmaceutials and chemistry.
All of science is loaded with jargon.
More to the point, the article is entirely genuine, but because it is heterodox and VERY dense, few people will have an inkling as to what it means. Much more fun to mock something complex and new than to struggle to understand it.
I have advanced degrees in science and have read the paper. I have had extensive exchanges with Erik over several years regarding its contents.
In addition, I have access to additional supporting material which is MUCH more expansive.I have quizzed Erik repeatedly over its contents. He has corrected errors and overstatements and given consistent answers.
Science is about protecting the status quo -- and defends it jealously.
Also, for your consideration: http://milesmathis.com/erik.pdf